Catch the bugs that static analysis can’t.
Trusted by engineering teams at
Ship faster than everwithout sacrificing quality
Remove the worst 3 hours of your week
Automate the 3+ hours per week each dev spends manually verifying AI code for runtime issues, with evidence
Scale testing without the bottleneck
Thorough dedicated QA expert on every pull request, scaling coverage without increasing manual overhead
Eliminate fire drills in production
Avoid expensive production incidents by catching behavioral regressions before they reach users
Ito tests everything your app actually does when it runs
Ito builds and runs your app from source and tests the frontend and backend as one system. It catches the bugs and broken flows that only show up at runtime, when both sides run together and real requests move through the app.
Backend testing
The UI can look right while the logic behind it is broken. Ito runs the real code behind your change, your business logic and database writes, and checks that what actually happens matches what the change intended.
Ito tests everything your app actually does when it runs
Ito builds and runs your app from source and tests the frontend and backend as one system. It catches the bugs and broken flows that only show up at runtime, when both sides run together and real requests move through the app.
Backend testing
The UI can look right while the logic behind it is broken. Ito runs the real code behind your change, your business logic and database writes, and checks that what actually happens matches what the change intended.
Frontend testing
Ito navigates your app like a real user, catching UI regressions before they reach a reviewer. When something breaks, you get a video replay and full evidence trail with everything you need to fix it.
how ito works
Ship fast, test automatically
---
Targeted test plans
- When a PR opens, Ito reads the diff and the PR description, then focuses its testing on the user flows your change affects
- It builds the plan on its own, no test cases to write and no suite to maintain
- Add plain-English test instructions to prioritize the scenarios that matter and skip the ones that don't
- For every PR, Ito builds and runs a real, single-use copy of your app from source
- Ito navigates your app like a real user, and every action runs your real backend code, surfacing the logic and data bugs code review can't catch by reading the diff
- Beyond the happy path, it runs the edge cases and adversarial scenarios that real-world use exposes
- Every PR gets a complete test summary: which flows passed, which failed, and exactly what Ito did to find out
- Every failure includes everything you need to fix it fast: a video replay, the exact lines responsible, and steps to reproduce.
- Severity ratings tell you what to tackle first, so you're not guessing what matters most
- Push a fix and Ito automatically re-runs to confirm it's resolved
- Talented senior engineers are spending 3+ hours/week on manual verification.
- Traditional automated QA is just shifting the burden from button clicking to constant test maintenance.
- Because manual ROI is so low, teams are only testing the "important stuff" and ship the rest, hoping for the best.
- Verification is an invisible, continuous infrastructure activity that triggers automatically the moment a PR is opened.
- Your team can move quickly and ship with total confidence by validating actual user outcomes instead of code patterns.
- Your best engineers are freed from repetitive clicking to focus on complex architecture and innovative features.
Containerized test execution
Full findings, right in your PR
WHY ITO
Why we built agentic infrastructure
The world handed us AI that writes code at terminal velocity, but left us with a legacy QA process. Ito bridges the gap, eliminating the manual testing bottleneck for good.
The problem: the manual testing tax
The solution: A closed dev loop
Ito helps my team ship faster by testing all edge cases right on their PRs. I refuse to go back to manual testing.
John Gazzini,
CTO at Truemed
I was very impressed with the zero configuration and all the different pathways it was testing. The computer use capability definitely sets it apart from other tools.
Andrew,
Founding Engineer at Inkeep
Ito caught 3-4 real things that got fixed in the first week. Impressed that backend mocking works autonomously.
Dan Kokotov,
CTO at CNaught
Power of manual QA on every PR lets my team ship faster without a quality tradeoff.
Josh Dong,
Founder at Temi
Reveal the regressions your suite can’t see.
Every PR comes with a QA report. Review cycles compress. Reviewers focus on quality, not verification. Merges happen the same day.
PRs verified in hours, not days.
2x more features shipped per sprint.
70% fewer production regressions.
10x more QA coverage. No extra headcount.
Questions teams ask before using Ito.
Common questions from engineering managers, senior engineers, and QA leads.
Does Ito access our source code?
Ito never stores your code. Our QA Agent deploys your application in an isolated, single-use sandbox environment to perform secure code execution. We test rigorously using computer-use agents and are currently pursuing SOC 2 compliance to ensure enterprise-grade security for every pull request test.
How does Ito handle authenticated user flows?
Ito is designed for complex behavioral user flows. It supports test environment credentials for flows that require multi-factor authentication or secure logins. You provide the credentials, and the QA Agent handles session management automatically, validating your application’s behavior just like a real user.
How long does setup take?
We offer an autonomous, scriptless setup. Connect your GitHub repository and Ito’s Agentic QA platform maps your application logic instantly. It creates code-aware testing plans with no manual setup required, though you can always add custom variables, secrets, and test data for deeper validation.
How is Ito different from code review tools like Cursor's bugbot, Greptile, or Coderabbit?
Those tools rely on static analysis to study your code. Ito is an execution-based QA Agent. While static analysis catches syntax or code-level issues, Ito catches behavioral regressions by actually running your app. It finds the "runtime" bugs—like broken UI logic or failed API integrations—that static tools simply cannot see.
How is Ito different from testing frameworks like Playwright or Cypress?
Playwright and Cypress are automated QA frameworks that require engineers to write and maintain brittle E2E test scripts. When your UI changes, those scripts break. Ito is the evolution of automated testing; it generates test cases from your app’s actual behavior. It provides scriptless end-to-end validation that adapts automatically as your UI evolves, eliminating the "maintenance tax."
Ship with total behavioral certainty.
Connect your repo and Ito starts testing pull requests right away. Each PR includes a full QA report with video, screenshots, and failure details directly in the PR.
no credit card required