Proposal for Assembly 2026: Disallow cryptocurrency projects #1254

codeberg.org · 2026-07-23 · by Long Nguyen ·generic
org - Official Codeberg Documents and their unofficial translations.

Proposal for Assembly 2026: Disallow cryptocurrency projects #1254

Code Issues 15 Pull requests 17 Activity

Conversation 8 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +1 \-1

Context:

camopantsrequested changes 2026-07-07 21:17:42 +02:00

Need to be careful with wording like this. If you are going to provide examples you need to make it clear it is not an exhaustive list:

"Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as - but not limited to - cryptocurrency related projects."

Need to be careful with wording like this. If you are going to provide examples you need to make it clear it is not an exhaustive list: "Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as - but not limited to - cryptocurrency related projects."

👍 1

The text is now as-is because it was send out for votes. Small clarifications can be made afterwards by Presidium or Board. The whole spirit of the vote makes it clear this is a "not limited to" case.

The text is now as-is because it was send out for votes. Small clarifications can be made afterwards by Presidium or Board. The whole spirit of the vote makes it clear this is a "not limited to" case.

gedankenstuecke referenced this pull request 2026-07-07 21:21:02 +02:00

Proposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions #1253

Is there a definition of "cryptocurrency-related" somewhere?

Is there a definition of "cryptocurrency-related" somewhere?

👍 1

This has passed.

image

This has passed. !\image\

image.png

53 KiB

👎 5 ❤️ 8

Gustedmerged commit f383b648fd into main 2026-07-22 02:02:22 +02:00

Gustedreferenced this pull request from a commit 2026-07-22 02:02:29 +02:00

Merge pull request 'Proposal for Assembly 2026: Disallow cryptocurrency projects' (#1254) from gusted/2026-assembly-cryptocurrency into main

Gusted referenced this pull request from Codeberg/Community 2026-07-22 02:28:17 +02:00

Codeberg must take a stricter stance against cryptocurrency projects #2184

Fk hell I just moved to a forge that banned bitcoin! Is this a joke??? <https://blog.codeberg.org/we-stay-strong-against-hate-and-hatred.html>

Fk hell I just moved to a forge that banned bitcoin! Is this a joke??? https://blog.codeberg.org/we-stay-strong-against-hate-and-hatred.html

👎 3 😆 3

Please explain how do cryptocurrency projects harm codeberg's reputation

<https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency>
"The page you requested could not be found."
Codeberg/Community#794
Codeberg/Community#2184
These domains are strongly associated with fraudulent activities and high-risk investments

Not all of them are about it. First of all, in context of so called code forges, this is a tech. What kind of headache do you have, that you judge the whole group by isolated cases, and block ANY such projects, even those that have real technical value?

Please explain how do cryptocurrency projects harm codeberg's reputation > https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency "The page you requested could not be found." > Codeberg/Community#794 > Codeberg/Community#2184 > These domains are strongly associated with fraudulent activities and high-risk investments Not all of them are about it. First of all, in context of so called code forges, this is a tech. What kind of headache do you have, that you judge the whole group by isolated cases, and block ANY such projects, even those that have real technical value?

👍 3

When some projects were transferred over, you started behaving strangely.

When some projects were transferred over, you started behaving strangely.

While I respect this seems to have been a community decision (I also despise the amount of fraud coming from the crypto space), this does set quite a concerning precedent, and makes me a little nervous to continue recommending Codeberg.

Banning an entire category of software based on bad actors within that category is extreme, and prevents any healthy crypto projects from emerging here.

While I respect this seems to have been a community decision (I also despise the amount of fraud coming from the crypto space), this does set quite a concerning precedent, and makes me a little nervous to continue recommending Codeberg. Banning an entire category of software based on bad actors within that category is extreme, and prevents any healthy crypto projects from emerging here.

👍 4

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No reviewers

Labels

Clear labels duplicateThis issue or pull request already exists enhancemenetprivacypolicyFeature concerning the Privacy Policy enhancementNew feature enhancementbylawsFeature concerning the Bylaws enhancementtosFeature concerning the ToS help wantedNeed some help invalidSomething is wrong questionMore information is needed reviewedProposal was reviewed and will be considered wontfixThis won't be fixed

No labels duplicate enhancemenetprivacypolicy enhancement enhancementbylaws enhancementtos help wanted invalid question reviewed wontfix

Milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No milestone

Assignees

Clear assignees

No assignees

7 participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference

Codeberg/org!1254

Write Preview

Loading…

| Rows | | | ------- | | | Columns | |

Cancel OK

Url Description

Hint: With a URL in your clipboard, you can paste directly into the editor to create a link.

Cancel OK

Cancel Save

Repository

Codeberg/org

Title

Body

Create issue

No description provided.

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?

No Yes

codeberg.org · 21 images · 76 links

Comments (0)

No comments yet