Proposal for Assembly 2026: Disallow cryptocurrency projects #1254
Code Issues 15 Pull requests 17 Activity
Conversation 8 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +1 \-1
Context:
- <https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency>
- Codeberg/Community#794
- Codeberg/Community#2184
- <https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency>
- Codeberg/Community#794
- Codeberg/Community#2184
Context: - https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency - https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/794 - https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2184
👍 4 👎 3 😆 1
Gustedadded 1 commit 2026-07-02 22:17:48 +02:00
Proposal for Assembly 2026: Disallow cryptocurrency projects... 1eff5dbfcf
Context:
camopantsrequested changes 2026-07-07 21:17:42 +02:00
Need to be careful with wording like this. If you are going to provide examples you need to make it clear it is not an exhaustive list:
"Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as - but not limited to - cryptocurrency related projects."
Need to be careful with wording like this. If you are going to provide examples you need to make it clear it is not an exhaustive list: "Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as - but not limited to - cryptocurrency related projects."
👍 1
The text is now as-is because it was send out for votes. Small clarifications can be made afterwards by Presidium or Board. The whole spirit of the vote makes it clear this is a "not limited to" case.
The text is now as-is because it was send out for votes. Small clarifications can be made afterwards by Presidium or Board. The whole spirit of the vote makes it clear this is a "not limited to" case.
gedankenstuecke referenced this pull request 2026-07-07 21:21:02 +02:00
Proposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions #1253
Is there a definition of "cryptocurrency-related" somewhere?
Is there a definition of "cryptocurrency-related" somewhere?
👍 1
This has passed.
This has passed. !\image\
53 KiB
👎 5 ❤️ 8
Gustedmerged commit f383b648fd into main 2026-07-22 02:02:22 +02:00
Gustedreferenced this pull request from a commit 2026-07-22 02:02:29 +02:00
Gusted referenced this pull request from Codeberg/Community 2026-07-22 02:28:17 +02:00
Codeberg must take a stricter stance against cryptocurrency projects #2184
Fk hell I just moved to a forge that banned bitcoin! Is this a joke??? <https://blog.codeberg.org/we-stay-strong-against-hate-and-hatred.html>
Fk hell I just moved to a forge that banned bitcoin! Is this a joke??? https://blog.codeberg.org/we-stay-strong-against-hate-and-hatred.html
👎 3 😆 3
Please explain how do cryptocurrency projects harm codeberg's reputation
<https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency>
"The page you requested could not be found."
Codeberg/Community#794
Codeberg/Community#2184
These domains are strongly associated with fraudulent activities and high-risk investments
Not all of them are about it. First of all, in context of so called code forges, this is a tech. What kind of headache do you have, that you judge the whole group by isolated cases, and block ANY such projects, even those that have real technical value?
Please explain how do cryptocurrency projects harm codeberg's reputation > https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency "The page you requested could not be found." > Codeberg/Community#794 > Codeberg/Community#2184 > These domains are strongly associated with fraudulent activities and high-risk investments Not all of them are about it. First of all, in context of so called code forges, this is a tech. What kind of headache do you have, that you judge the whole group by isolated cases, and block ANY such projects, even those that have real technical value?
👍 3
When some projects were transferred over, you started behaving strangely.
When some projects were transferred over, you started behaving strangely.
While I respect this seems to have been a community decision (I also despise the amount of fraud coming from the crypto space), this does set quite a concerning precedent, and makes me a little nervous to continue recommending Codeberg.
Banning an entire category of software based on bad actors within that category is extreme, and prevents any healthy crypto projects from emerging here.
While I respect this seems to have been a community decision (I also despise the amount of fraud coming from the crypto space), this does set quite a concerning precedent, and makes me a little nervous to continue recommending Codeberg. Banning an entire category of software based on bad actors within that category is extreme, and prevents any healthy crypto projects from emerging here.
👍 4
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels duplicateThis issue or pull request already exists enhancemenetprivacypolicyFeature concerning the Privacy Policy enhancementNew feature enhancementbylawsFeature concerning the Bylaws enhancementtosFeature concerning the ToS help wantedNeed some help invalidSomething is wrong questionMore information is needed reviewedProposal was reviewed and will be considered wontfixThis won't be fixed
No labels duplicate enhancemenetprivacypolicy enhancement enhancementbylaws enhancementtos help wanted invalid question reviewed wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
7 participants
Notifications
Subscribe
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
Codeberg/org!1254
Write Preview
Loading…
| Rows | | | ------- | | | Columns | |
Cancel OK
Url Description
Hint: With a URL in your clipboard, you can paste directly into the editor to create a link.
Cancel OK
Cancel Save
Repository
Codeberg/org
Title
Body
Create issue
No description provided.
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
No Yes