AMD attacks the rack with Helios systems that rival Nvidia's

www.theregister.com · 2026-07-24 · by Long Nguyen ·generic
Spec for spec, the House of Zen's first rack-scale AI compute platform is bigger and faster than Nvidia's Vera Rubin by nearly every metric, but that's only on paper

AMD attacks the rack with Helios systems that rival Nvidia's

Could Nvidia's days of datacenter dominance be threatened? With the launch of Helios, AMD’s first true rack-scale AI platform, the House of Zen is done playing catch up.

The company claims the rack system is powered by the fastest AI accelerators on the market. And, at least on paper, the 72-GPU system is not only bigger and faster by nearly every metric than Nvidia’s existing Blackwell-based rack systems but than Vera Rubin as well, and that includes the rack.

Measuring in at 1.2 meters wide and 44OUs high, the OCP Open Rack Wide form factor is nearly twice the size of Nvidia's NVL72, and AMD has clearly put the extra space to good use.

REG AD

Compared to Vera Rubin, Helios boasts 50 percent more HBM4 and scale out bandwidth and between 15 and 25 percent higher performance for AI training.

REG AD

Vera Rubin’s adaptive compression tech will supposedly give it a 25 percent lead over Helios at FP4, but, as we understand it, that’s only for inference workloads. For applications that can’t, Helios offers 15 percent higher peak FP4 FLOPS.

To be clear, it’s not the first time we’ve seen AMD pull ahead on memory or FLOPS. The difference is those products usually launched a year after Nvidia’s equivalent part. Helios launches right in time with Nvidia’s Vera Rubin platform.

AMD estimates Helios' higher peak performance will give it a 30 percent performance per dollar lead over the competition.

The belly of the beast

Helios' performance gains are rooted in an all-new GPU built on AMD’s 5th-gen CDNA compute architecture.

Much like the rack it powers, the Instinct MI455X is massive, though the chip is underselling it a bit. Just like the MI300 series, AMD’s latest datacenter GPU is a silicon sandwich that stitches together I/O, compute, and memory in a single package.

Like previous Instinct CPUs, the MI455X isn't one chip, but nearly two dozen, compute, I/O, and memory chiplets stitched together with TSMC's advanced packaging tech.

Like previous Instinct GPUs, the MI455X isn't one chip, but nearly two dozen compute, I/O, and memory chiplets stitched together with TSMC's advanced packaging tech.

Image credit AMD

Including memory, MI455X features 24 chiplets using a combination of 2.5D and 3D packaging technologies. The chip’s eight compute dies are fabbed on TSMC’s bleeding edge 2nm process tech, which are stacked atop a pair of 3nm fabric and cache dies (FCDs). The FCDs are an interesting twist on the formula. They function as a cache heavy interposer with 96 MB of L2 cache each and the memory controllers for the chip’s 12, 36 GB HBM4 stacks.

Unlike past Instinct accelerators in which the I/O die was located under the compute, the MI455X breaks these out into two new dies — also fabbed on TSMC’s 3 nm — which are responsible for chip-to-chip communication.

REG AD

AMD's chiplet architecture means it can function as one big GPU, two smaller ones, or up to eight virtualized accelerators.

AMD's chiplet architecture means it can function as one big GPU, two smaller ones, or up to eight virtualized accelerators.

Image credit AMD

One benefit to this architecture is that the chip can be made to function as one big GPU or two smaller ones depending on which NUMA configuration you opt for. The chip also supports spatial partitioning into up to eight virtual GPUs.

Under the hood, AMD’s CDNA architecture brings some notable improvements over the last generation. Compared to last year’s MI355X, the MI455X promises as much as 4x higher floating point performance for AI workloads.

In just a year, AMD has managed to deliver a 4x uplift in floating point performance over MI355X.

In just a year, AMD has managed to deliver a 4x uplift in floating point performance over MI355X.

Image credit AMD

Most notably, the MI455X forgoes FP64 entirely in order to dedicate as much die area to AI-centric datatypes like MXFP4 and MXFP8 as possible. This generation also adds support for 16 and 32 block scale data types. For those needing FP64 compute, that functionality will be served by a different HPC centric SKU.

This isn’t the only physical change. As we mentioned earlier, for this generation, AMD has opted for a larger shared L2 cache and ditched its last level “Infinity” cache altogether.

The benefit, AMD fellow Alan Smith says, is higher bandwidth and a simplified data path compared to last gen. “The bandwidth delivered for one of these L2 caches in MI455X is 1.5x the aggregate bandwidth of the Infinity cache on MI355X."

Along with prioritizing low precision compute, AMD configured the chip’s execution engines to boost IPC and implemented a new direct memory access (DMA) engine to minimize data movement.

Racking it up

While bigger than Nvidia’s NVL72, AMD’s Helios rack architecture is remarkably similar.

REG AD

Here's a quick run down of the Helios compute blade, which crams four MI455X GPUs, 12 Vulcano smartNICs, a Salina DPU, and a 96-core Venice Epyc CPU into a 1OU form factor.

Here's a quick rundown of the Helios compute blade, which crams four MI455X GPUs, 12 Vulcano smartNICs, a Salina DPU, and a 96-core Venice Epyc CPU into a 1OU form factor.

Image credit AMD

Both systems pack 72 GPUs spread across 18 liquid-cooled compute blades. Each blade is equipped with four MI455Xs, but rather than two CPUs per blade like you’d find on NVL72, AMD has opted for a single 96-core Venice Epyc clocking up to 5 GHz, though OEMs and hyperscalers could theoretically spec each blade with up to 256 cores, if they wanted to.

Each of Helios' 6 switch blades features two 102.4 Tbps Broadcom Tomahawk 6 switch ASICs.

Each of Helios' 6 switch blades features two 102.4 Tbps Broadcom Tomahawk 6 switch ASICs.

Image credit AMD

The scale-up fabric used to make the six dozen GPUs behave as one great big one is, it shouldn't surprise anyone, also quite similar to Nvidia's NVL72. But rather than NVLink, AMD is tunneling Ultra Accelerator Link over Ethernet (UALoE).

This means AMD doesn’t need bespoke switches and system builders can get away with merchant silicon from the likes of Broadcom — and that’s exactly what they’ve done.

The Helios reference design uses 12 of Broadcom’s 102.4 Tbps Tomahawk 6 switch ASICs spread across six switch trays. Each provides 512 lanes of 200 Gbps connectivity, just enough to feed each MI455X with 3.6 TB/s of bidirectional bandwidth.

The all-to-all scale up fabric ensures that any one GPU can talk to any other while keeping latency to an absolute minimum.

The all-to-all scale up fabric ensures that any one GPU can talk to any other while keeping latency to an absolute minimum.

Image credit AMD

Helios’ scale out networking is also quite a bit beefier than Nvidia’s Vera Rubin. The Nvidia platform pairs each GPU with a single 1.6 Tbps ConnectX-9 superNIC. By comparison, each MI455X gets three of AMD’s 800 Gbps Pensando Vulcano network cards for a total of 2.4 Tbps of scale out bandwidth per accelerator.

These scale out NICs are designed for large scale inference and training workloads that require multiple racks' worth of GPUs. For front-end communications, which include management, API traffic, and storage, each of Helios' 18 compute blades is equipped with a 400 Gbps Pensando Salina data processing unit (DPU).

Here's an exploded view of the Helios rack showing all of the supporting infrastructure, like cable carts, coolant manifolds, and power delivery necessary to keep the system humming along.

Here's an exploded view of the Helios rack showing all of the supporting infrastructure, like cable carts, coolant manifolds, and power delivery necessary to keep the system humming along.

Image credit AMD

All of this is powered by a 50 volt liquid-cooled DC bus bar located at the back of the system that under load can deliver between 225 and 245 kW of power. Nvidia hasn’t shared system-level power consumption for its Vera Rubin racks just yet, but our best estimates put peak power consumption at somewhere between 240 and 250 kW.

If Helios can deliver the performance claimed and our power estimates are accurate, that would not only make the platform faster than Vera Rubin, but more power efficient as well.

MORE CONTEXT

www.theregister.com · 21 images · 126 links

Comments (0)

No comments yet