GLM-5.3 (max) Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

artificialanalysis.ai · 2026-08-20 · by Long Nguyen ·generic
Analysis of Z AI's GLM-5.3 (max) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first token), context window & more.

GLM-5.3 (max) Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

Artificial Analysis

[](https://artificialanalysis.ai/login)K

GLM-5.3 (max) logo

Z AI

•

Proprietary model

•

Released August 2026

GLM-5.3 (max) Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

CompareAPI Provider Benchmarks

Model summary

#### Intelligence

#8 / 182

60

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

4 out of 4 units for Intelligence.

#### Speed

#55 / 182

93.2

Output tokens per second

3 out of 4 units for Speed.

#### Cost

#54 / 182

In $1.40Out $4.40Cache Discount 81%

$0.68

Cost per Intelligence Index task

3 out of 4 units for Cost.

#### Verbosity

#73 / 182

170M

Output tokens from Intelligence Index

4 out of 4 units for Verbosity.

Comparison Summary

GLM-5.3 (max) is amongst the leading models in intelligence and reasonably priced when comparing to other models of similar price. It's also faster than average, however very verbose. The model supports text input, outputs text, and has a 1M tokens context window.

GLM-5.3 (max) scores 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among comparable models (median: 35). When evaluating the Intelligence Index, it generated 170M tokens, which is very verbose in comparison to the median of 72M.

Pricing for GLM-5.3 (max) is $1.40 per 1M input tokens (moderately priced, median: $1.75) and $4.40 per 1M output tokens (moderately priced, median: $10.00). In total, it cost $1238.50 to evaluate GLM-5.3 (max) on the Intelligence Index.

At 93 tokens per second, GLM-5.3 (max) is faster than average (75).

Technical specifications

| Reasoning | YesThis page shows the reasoning version of this model.A non-reasoning variant may also exist. | | --------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Input modality | Supports: text | | Output modality | Supports: text | | Context window | 1M\~1500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font |

182 models in this class

Metrics are compared against models of the same class:

  • Non-reasoning models → compared only with other non-reasoning models
  • Reasoning models → compared across both reasoning and non-reasoning
  • Open weights models → compared only with other open weights models of the same size class:
  • * Tiny: ≤4B parameters * Small: 4B–40B parameters * Medium: 40B–150B parameters * Large: >150B parameters
  • Proprietary models → compared across proprietary and open weights models of the same price range, using a blended 3:1 input/output price ratio:
  • * <$0.15 per 1M tokens * $0.15–$1 per 1M tokens * \>$1 per 1M tokens

    Highlights

    Intelligence

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

    Speed

    Output tokens per second · Higher is better

    Cost per Task

    Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

    Prompt Options

    Intelligence

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexUpdatedAgentic IndexUpdated

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

    Open Weights / ProprietaryReasoning / Non-ReasoningText Only / Multimodal Inputs

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    ProprietaryOpen Weights (Commercial Use Restricted)Open Weights

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

    ###

    Open Weights

    Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if commercial use is limited by conditions, and as 'Non-commercial' if the license prohibits commercial use.

    Benchmarks

    Intelligence Evaluations

    Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

    CodingTool UsePrivate DatasetUser InteractionFinanceMedicalLegalIntelligence IndexLong ContextMultimodalInstruction FollowingFaithfulnessWritingBusinessSee more

    19 of 23 evaluations

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    GDPval-AA v2

    Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

    𝜏³-BankingUpdated

    Agentic tool use

    Terminal-Bench v2.1

    Agentic coding & terminal use

    SciCode

    Coding

    Humanity's Last ExamUpdated

    Reasoning & knowledge

    GPQA Diamond

    Scientific reasoning

    CritPt

    Physics reasoning

    AA-Omniscience AccuracyUpdated

    Knowledge

    AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination RateUpdated

    1 - hallucination rate

    AA-LCRUpdated

    Long context reasoning

    AA-Briefcase

    Agentic knowledge work, Elo

    AutomationBench-AA

    Agentic SaaS workflows

    Harvey LAB-AA

    Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

    EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

    Agentic business operations

    AA-AnalystAgentNew

    Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

    IFBench

    Instruction following

    APEX-Agents-AA

    Long-horizon agentic tasks

    ITBench-AA

    Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

    MMMU-Pro

    Visual reasoning

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Intelligence Evaluation Relevance

    While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

    ###

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

    AA-Omniscience

    AA-Omniscience IndexAA-Omniscience AccuracyAA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

    AA-Omniscience Index

    AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

    29 of 481 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    AA-Omniscience Index

    AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

    Intelligence Index Comparisons

    Intelligence Index vs. Cost per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Time per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Output SpeedIntelligence Index vs. End-to-End Response Time

    Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Most attractive quadrant

    Pareto line

    Z AIMetaOpenAINVIDIADeepSeekGoogleAnthropicSpaceXAIKimiAlibaba

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Cost per Intelligence Index Task

    Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

    ###

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

    Token Use

    Output Tokens per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Output Tokens per TaskIntelligence Index Token UseIntelligence Index vs. Token Use

    Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

    Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    AnswerReasoning

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

    The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

    Cost

    Cost per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Cost per TaskEvaluation Breakdown

    Cost per Intelligence Index Task

    Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    AnswerReasoningCache WriteCache HitInput

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Cost per Intelligence Index Task

    Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

    Intelligence Index Total CostIntelligence Index vs. Total Cost

    Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    OutputReasoningCache WriteCache ReadNon-Cache Input

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

    The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

    Cache Hit, Input, and Output PricingBlended PriceBlended Price (Stacked)Cache DiscountIntelligence Index vs. PriceIntelligence Index vs. Price (Log, Inverted)Image Input Pricing

    Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

    Price (USD per M Tokens)

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    Cache HitInputOutput

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Cache Hit

    Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

    4 more notes

    Context Window

    Context WindowIntelligence Index vs. Context Window

    Context Window

    Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Context Window for RAG

    Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

    ###

    Context Window

    Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

    Speed

    Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

    Output SpeedOutput Speed by Prompt TypeOutput Speed VarianceOutput Speed Over TimeOutput Speed vs. PriceLatency vs. Output Speed

    Output Speed

    Output tokens per second · Higher is better

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Output Speed

    Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

    ###

    Model Performance Representation

    Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

    Time per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Time per TaskCost vs. Time per Task

    Time per Intelligence Index Task

    Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Time per Intelligence Index Task

    The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

    Latency

    Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

    Time To First Answer TokenTime To First TokenLatency by Prompt TypeLatency VarianceLatency Over Time

    Latency: Time To First Answer Token

    Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    Thinking (reasoning models, when applicable)Input processing

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    Time to First Answer Token

    Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

    End-to-End Response Time

    Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

    End-to-End Response TimeEnd-to-End Response Time by Prompt TypeEnd-to-End Response Time Over Time

    End-to-End Response Time

    Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better

    29 of 610 models

    NEW

    Add model from specific provider

    Outputting time'Thinking' time (reasoning models)Input processing time

    Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

    ###

    End-to-End Response Time

    Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

  • Input time: Time to receive the first response token
  • Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
  • Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

###

Model Performance Representation

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GLM-5.3 (max)

When was GLM-5.3 (max) released?

GLM-5.3 (max) was released on August 18, 2026.

Who created GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) was created by Z AI.

How intelligent is GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) scores 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 35).

How fast is GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) generates output at 93.2 tokens per second (based on Z AI's API), which is above average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 75.4 t/s).

What is the latency of GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 1.92s (based on Z AI's API), which is better than average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 2.81s).

How much does GLM-5.3 (max) cost?

GLM-5.3 (max) costs $1.40 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $1.75) and $4.40 per 1M output tokens (better than average, median: $10.00), based on Z AI's API.

What is GLM-5.3 (max) API pricing?

GLM-5.3 (max) costs $1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens (based on Z AI's API). For a blended rate (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio), this is $0.90 per 1M tokens. Pricing may vary by provider. Compare provider pricing

How verbose is GLM-5.3 (max)?

When evaluated on the Intelligence Index, GLM-5.3 (max) generated 170M output tokens, which is at the higher end compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 72M).

Is GLM-5.3 (max) a reasoning model?

Yes, GLM-5.3 (max) is a reasoning model. It uses extended thinking or chain-of-thought reasoning to work through complex problems before providing an answer.

What input modalities does GLM-5.3 (max) support?

GLM-5.3 (max) supports text input.

What output modalities does GLM-5.3 (max) support?

GLM-5.3 (max) supports text output.

Can GLM-5.3 (max) process images?

No, GLM-5.3 (max) does not support image input. It can only process text.

Is GLM-5.3 (max) multimodal?

No, GLM-5.3 (max) is not multimodal. It only supports text input.

What is the context window of GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. This determines how much text and conversation history the model can process in a single request.

Is GLM-5.3 (max) open source?

No, GLM-5.3 (max) is proprietary. The model weights are not publicly available.

How many parameters does GLM-5.3 (max) have?

GLM-5.3 (max) has 753 billion parameters.

How does GLM-5.3 (max) perform on benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 (max) achieves a score of 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This composite benchmark evaluates models across reasoning, knowledge, mathematics, and coding.

Is GLM-5.3 (max) available via API?

Yes, GLM-5.3 (max) is available via API through 2 providers. Compare API providers

Where can I use GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) is available through 2 API providers. Compare providers

artificialanalysis.ai · 1 images · 43 links

Comments (0)

No comments yet