Find what attackers can exploitand fix what matters first.
Continuous autonomous AI pentesting
Find what attackers can exploit
and fix what matters first.Continuous autonomous AI pentesting for applications, APIs, and infrastructure. Proven attack paths, clear fix priorities, and verified remediation.
Request a demo
Reproducible evidence for engineering. Clear priorities for security leadership.
The evidence gap
New attack paths emerge.
Even when your code doesn’t change.A new release can expose a weakness. So can a newly discovered vulnerability in an SDK, dependency, or service you already use.
JANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC
SYSTEM CHANGESRELEASES
NEW VULNERABILITIESNEW PATHS
PERIODIC ASSESSMENTSSNAPSHOTS
HOG3 TESTINGCONTINUOUS
Map your attack surface.
Apps, APIs, infrastructure and identities. Including authenticated testing.
Chain weaknesses into a working attack.
Follow the path across systems. Prove what an attacker can reach.
Show what’s actually at risk.
Reproducible evidence. Clear business consequences.
Proven findings
See the attack.
Understand the impact.Example findings from a report;
Example finding 01ExpandModeled exposureMass account takeoverA credential list costs under $100. Every reused password becomes a working session.$324Mmodeled customer exposureExample finding 02ExpandMeasured findingSource and secrets disclosureNothing is exploited and nothing needs to be. The map of your attack surface is a public download.1,540source files recovered from productionExample finding 03ExpandPotential reachAdministrative impersonationOne request reaches any account on the platform. No credentials, no password, nothing to rate-limit.27Maccounts potentially in range
Mass account takeover
A $100 list of leaked passwords, tried against your login at scale. Every reused password becomes a working session, and the session can move money.
- Proved end to end against a test account, not scanned
- Three medium findings, chained into one critical path
- $324M of exposure, modeled from your own figures
- Fixed in two lines and retested to a closed finding
- 1,540 source files rebuilt from production, without a credential
- 34 internal hosts named in them, 11 answering anyone who asks
- 4 live API keys, sitting in the bundle you ship to every browser
- Closed in an afternoon and retested to none answering
- One request, no credentials, nothing for a rate limit to catch
- Any of 27,000,000 accounts, chosen by id
- Ranked above the $324M scenario, because reach comes first
- Proved against a test account and closed the same day
- The first fix is the one that closes the most access
- Each finding carries the proof that produced it
- A priority you can defend, because it is tied to real access
- A concrete fix, written for the engineer who owns the code
- Fix the top item first; the ranked list says what is next
- Your team makes the change. HOG3 never touches production.
- The same exploit, replayed against the fix
- Evidence of the failed attack, kept with the finding
- A finding closes only when the replayed attack fails
- Applications
- APIs
- Cloud infrastructure
- Mobile applications
- Identity systems
- External attack surfaces
#### The chain, proved
Three medium findings became one critical path. HOG3 ran it end to end against a test account, with the request and response attached.
#### The number, modeled
$324M from your own figures: account count, median value, and one assumed reuse rate. Change an input and the figure moves with it.
#### Fixed, then retested
Two lines your team owns: a rate limit on the grant and an authorization check on the mutation. The retest breaks the chain at F23.
#### Does your login take a list?
Request a demoNext finding
Source and secrets disclosure
Nothing is exploited here and nothing needs to be. The map of your attack surface is a public download, and it is the first step of every other scenario in this run.
#### The bundle, unpacked
One request per bundle rebuilt 1,540 files of readable source. No credentials, no exploit, and nothing unusual in your logs.
#### The hosts, named
34 internal hosts named in the source. 11 of them answer without credentials. 4 carry a live API key.
#### Closed in an afternoon
Source maps off in production, the four keys rotated, the eleven hosts behind an allowlist. The retest found none answering.
#### What is in your bundle right now?
Request a demoNext finding
Administrative impersonation
The worst finding in the run, and it does not carry the biggest number. One request reaches any account on the platform, which is why it was fixed first.
#### One request, any account
The impersonation mutation was built for support tooling and shipped to everyone. From any session it reaches any account by id.
#### Ranked above the money
It costs the attacker nothing per account and gives your defenders no signal. Scenario 01 quantifies further; this one is fixed first.
#### Closed the same day
An authorization check on the mutation, then the retest: the same request from the same session, and a 403.
#### Which of your endpoints was built for support and shipped to everyone?
Request a demoNext finding
Fix & retest
Fix what matters first.
Prove the fix worked.HOG3 ranks findings by what an attacker can reach. Your team fixes the issue; HOG3 repeats the attack to verify the fix.
Findings · ranked by reachSorting 3 ranked
1. 01 ##### Administrative impersonation Direct access to customer accounts. No credentials needed. 2. 02 ##### Exposed credentials Account access depends on matching passwords. 3. 03 ##### Source disclosure Reveals internal systems for further attacks.
01
Start with the most direct access.
Every finding is ranked by what an attacker can actually reach from it, not by a generic severity score.
Recommended fix · administrative impersonationOpen Fixed
api/accounts.ts
1. 41 const account = accounts.get(id) 2. 42+if (!session.can("admin", account)) deny() 3. 43 return account
Owner Platform teamScope one route
02
The exact fix, not a CVE number.
Every priority ships with a recommended fix the owning engineer can act on: the route, the check, the line.
Retest · same attack, replayedRetesting Access blocked
Same attack
Access check
×
Customer account
Attack replayed after the fix. Access denied. Finding closed with the evidence attached.
03
Closed means the attack failed.
Not that the ticket did. HOG3 repeats the original attack against the fixed system and records whether it still works.
Coverage & cadence
Continuous testing,
shaped around your business.Tailored monthly or annual subscriptions. Scope and cadence agreed around your business.
Daily, weekly, monthly, or custom assessments. Retest on releases, infrastructure changes, and fixes.
Security & control
Autonomous testing.
Explicit boundaries.Your scope. Human oversight. Auditable activity. Testing starts with explicit authorization.
1. 01
Authorized scope
Agree the systems and boundaries before testing. 2. 02Human oversight
Human validation and optional signed reports. 3. 03Auditable activity
Traceable evidence for engineering and audit preparation. 4. 04Verified remediation
Evidence that separates a reported fix from a verified result.Frequently asked questions
01Is HOG3 a vulnerability scanner?
HOG3 investigates and validates exploitability, including multi-step attack paths. Its output includes reproducible evidence, business-impact context, remediation guidance, and fix verification.
02Can HOG3 test authenticated applications and APIs?
Yes. Authenticated application and API testing is part of the offering. Access requirements and the assessment scope are agreed before testing begins.
03How often does testing run?
The cadence is tailored to your business. Deeper assessments can run daily, weekly, monthly, or on another agreed schedule, supported by release-triggered testing, infrastructure-change testing, and remediation retests.
04What does our team receive?
Proven findings with reproducible evidence, attack-path explanations, business-impact context, remediation priorities, and guidance. Retest results document whether the assessed paths remain exploitable after fixes.
05How is HOG3 priced?
HOG3 is sold through tailored monthly or annual subscription agreements. Scope, cadence, and engagement requirements are agreed with your business.
06Can we evaluate HOG3 before subscribing?
Start with a demo of the platform and its findings. Where appropriate, we can discuss a scoped free pentest. Testing your environment requires explicit authorization and agreed boundaries.

